So far, I can talk only reflect on one day at Curie Metro
High School, though I will say it was quite an eventful one!
I have been to Bogan High School previously, which is about
20 blocks or so away from Curie. On my way to Bogan for two semesters worth of
fieldwork, I would pass by Curie every day. Though it was wrong of me to do
this, I was quick to just lump Curie as a “trouble” school alongside Bogan.
Some of you have been there, so you’ll know what I’m talking about when I say
Bogan was quite the eye-opener. The administration cared less and less about
its students, and it reflected in the school environment. When I got placed at
Curie, I anticipated that the situation would look similar. Boy, was I wrong. I
walked into Curie, and found myself feeling as if I were in a completely
different part of Chicago. Of all schools I have observed, I will say Curie is
most like my own high school, Guerin College Prep in northwest suburbs—not even
Foreman, a school just 10 minutes east down Belmont, compares to Guerin the way
Curie does. I still have yet to pinpoint what it is exactly about Curie that
sets it so drastically apart from neighboring schools. Could it be that most
students are placed in majors (IB, MYP, AVID)? Could it be the administration’s
attention to the student experience? What makes this school, one that could
easily fall down the path of Bogan (an IB-integrated school as well, mind you)
steer so clear of this track? I hope to answer these as the semester moves
along.
While I’m sure the school has its problems, from first
impression, it is immediately clear to me that it is not a school you’d imagine
when considering the southwest side of Chicago. In addition to this surprise, my mentor teacher, Tricia, is
awesome! She is one of two heads of the English department, so I will have the
opportunity to see the inner workings of such a large and invested department.
It is also really great that Tricia and I seemingly share the same kinds of
teaching philosophies. She teaches at an extremely diverse (in many ways) school,
and I can already tell that she attends to that in even the slightest, most
minute ways that really impact how students learn in her classroom. We’re
talking about instructional delivery (Cooper), and that ties in quite well to
the day I spent with Tricia. In her freshman class, she is working a lot on
grammar in this unit, and I observed on one of the days she was lecturing—though
I wouldn’t necessarily call it that. Though she lectured on the use of Cornell
notes and annotating language, grammar, and syntax use, she disguised it in a
way so that the students were interacting with the “lecture,” as opposed to
simply sitting there and taking notes. Her use of worksheets, mini-projects,
and even voice clips took what could have been a boring 50-minute lecture and
elevated it into a multi-layered lesson.
Kudos to you for acknowledging that it may not have been the best thing to label Curie as a "trouble" school alongside Bogan, although many of us make these type of assumptions, because it is an experience just like this that will reflect how we are as teachers. Do we give those "low income, minority, troubled" students the benefit of the doubt and walk in the class as if their capabilities far exceed their resources? The answer is yes! I think? I am extremely curious and interested in knowing how your experiences at Curie go because that is one of the 5 schools I put in for student teaching. The fact that you are placed with a teacher that is head of the English department is fantastic and I hope that in future posts or in classroom discussion to can give examples of the things she does inside and outside the classroom, relative to lesson planning and goals for both her classroom and the whole English department.
ReplyDelete